Requested developments

A new person who signs up to a group via the form does not have the possibility to choose communication preferences as is the case via the home page. So how do you know your preference? Would it be possible to give him this opportunity as soon as he registered via a form?

When the bride and groom register with the beta form, they do not sign the RGPD and do not receive a link to access their home and I do not control the household for baptisms, the parents do not sign the RGPD.

Strongly delete particularly confidential and temporary information. For example, notes are written on catechumen sheets, notes that are not intended to be kept, and therefore not archived. It should be possible to “destroy” them without possible return, even with the restoration of a database archive.

Since the implementation of the new registration form, if a person is known to the database, they are sent a “verification code” to confirm their identity. Would it be possible to activate this mechanism for the “Home” link as well? Some people inadvertently forward an email that contains their “strictly personal link”, which allows anyone to impersonate them.

Good morning, Presumably many celebrants, for the sake of convenience, use American mailboxes. Since religious data is described as “sensitive”, it seems to me that Gmail, Outlook, Live, Yahoo etc. boxes are inadequate. And the Privacy Data Framework, although “validated” by the CJEU, offers absolutely no security as to the proper processing of personal data. To fully understand the problem, you should read the judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal of 24 January 2025 “in recess” - RG no. 21/10238 Concretely, dioceses should provide email addresses to celebrants on secure and independent services, as does, for example, the Chamber of Notaries. It is a real and serious problem and I am ready to discuss it with the Diocese. This problem is all the more important to examine as I think that the Enoria service also uses Google services for email: https://independance.numericatous.fr/?r=kjo087u6 From my point of view, there is a real work of analysis and evolution to be done regards Pierre Opter

When a new family registers one of its children via a form for baptism, for the awakening to the faith, for the KT... only the child benefits from RGPD consent through registration, the other members of the family do not have consent. Analyzing the database of individuals with respect to the GDPR is therefore complicated, because many parents leave without GDPR consent, even though their presence in the database was validated by them when registering their child. Would it be possible to have a RGPD mention at the household level specifying at least the last consent for its members? RGPD analysis and cleaning the base by entering through the homes would be easier. On the other hand, a search on households in relation to the last payment or the last registration in a group of one of its members, would make it possible to immediately see inactive households.

Good morning, In the administrative request forms for baptisms and marriages (functionality set up in the Configuration section), would it be possible to automatically include the legal information defined for the entity to display the RGPD mentions? Thank you

When someone makes a change in their home and the ward admin doesn't agree to the change, shouldn't we send an email notification that the change has not been accepted? J

When anonymizing a person, it should be possible to erase the address of their home and their Christian life information (baptism, first communion and confirmation)

If you archive a person, they are always accessible by users via the sacraments, groups and especially via their home. Would it be possible to archive households where all members are archived and, conversely, to archive all members of a household by archiving their household?